Is anyone else tired of hearing...Oh, Michael Vick is in (blank) town...that must be the team that is going to sign him. Yeah...he has to be there for that, doesn't he?
Check out the latest adventure from David Haugh of the Chicago Tribune here .
More from the Chicago Sun-Times here .
((Michael Vick photo//Chicago Sun-Times File))
Also, there is rampant speculation...and in some cases criticism of the "1st" Michael Vick interview, set to air Sunday on 60 minutes.
Check out this interesting take on the whole thing from the Baltimore Sun's TV Critic David Zurawick here .
I understand the point Zurawick is trying to make here but I think he's being really insulting to James Brown at the same time. No, JB is not a "High Falutin' News God, but he seems to be a pretty fair guy who knows how to tell a story. Anyone who has seen his work on "Real Sports" can attest to that. Zurawick...and others need to chill. Let Vick tell his story if he wants. It doesn't matter what he says "On TV". What is going to matter will be what he does off of it.
Just for kicks, here is a look back at the "Michael Vick Experience" ((Courtesy: You Tube))
2 comments:
I agree that the whole saga is ridiculous. I can't see the value of signing Vick given the fact that you would lose fans, and he hasn't played in years.
Someone will take the leap they are all just waiting to see who will be first.
Post a Comment